MichBio Statement on Proposed Cuts to NIH Funding and Impact to Americas Leadership Innovation

February 10, 2025

MichBio Opposes NIH Cuts, Defending U.S. Leadership in Bioscience Innovation

The Trump Administration announced last Friday that it is drastically reducing so-called “indirect” payments by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to universities, clinical centers, and research institutes. This move will be a catastrophic blow to scientific discovery and innovation in Michigan and across the U.S. It will quickly undermine America as a global leader in the life sciences, with broad and deleterious impacts on the economy and health.


MichBio, as Michigan’s biosciences industry association, represents almost 4,800 establishments statewide involved in the research, development, and manufacturing of medical devices, pharmaceuticals, agricultural and industrial biotechnology-based foods and products, health information technologies, bioscience product distribution, and testing and clinical trials. Our biosciences innovation ecosystem at its core is the university-based research complex – indeed Michigan’s research universities are top ten nationally in the amount of federal R&D funds received – which in turn provides the substrate for commercialization of biomedical technologies that save lives.


Our life sciences community is deeply alarmed over the capricious and arbitrary measure to limit NIH and other federal funding for university-based research. Any such restrictions are irrational and ill-conceived.


We adamantly oppose any efforts to diminish critical research that fuels Michigan’s innovation economy.


Funding of facilities and administrative expenditures are part and parcel of the total costs of conducting world-class research – they are real and documented costs. This funding provides the necessary critical infrastructure for cutting-edge biomedical research and has long been recognized by the NIH as key to maintaining the US’s preeminence in biomedical innovation. Support for indirect expenses is precisely why NIH funding is valuable in advancing medical research, fostering economic growth, and enhancing public health.


This decision will have deleterious implications for the Michigan and U.S. innovation economy and workforce and its ability to remain a cutting-edge leader in research and development. Cutbacks will force institutions to eliminate personnel, shut down research programs, halt or cancel clinical trials, and result in the collapse of U.S. biomedical discovery and education. The chaos and harm that will ensue will be immeasurable and will have a longstanding impact on practically every academic research and medical institution in the country. It will result in fewer training opportunities in research labs, diminishing the biomedical workforce development pipeline for years to come – as a top ten producer of STEM talent, Michigan can ill afford to lose its future life sciences workforce. Most importantly, there will be a significant and long-term impact on patients who depend on discoveries made in our institutions and others.


Moreover, we question the legality of the indirect cost caps as current law prohibits NIH from making such changes without the approval of Congress. In addition, the annual spending bill for HHS, and by extension, NIH, has language prohibiting changes to indirect cost rates. That’s done purposefully so research operations can run efficiently and without interruption.


Michigan’s and the national biosciences research enterprise simply can’t survive, much less thrive, such a callous attempt to destroy a viable innovation engine. This sudden policy announcement, coupled with recent disruptions to grant reviews and trainee funding, suggests that the Trump Administration deliberately wants to damage science.



We urge NIH leaders to rescind this dangerous policy before its harms are felt by Americans. MichBio asks the Michigan Congressional delegation to demand the Administration roll back the proposed measure and ensure that the NIH and NSF funding remains intact, and the U.S. biosciences economy continues to be the leader and envy of others globally.

RECENT ARTICLES

April 24, 2025
Prenuptial Patenting: Responsible Engagement with Engineering Firms
April 24, 2025
PharmOptima, a Poratge, Michigan-based preclinical contract research organization (CRO) is advancing drug discovery through its comprehensive suite of services. Specializing in in-vivo ADME/PK, ocular research, as well as regulated large and small molecule bioanalytical and ligand binding services, PharmOptima supports clients in optimizing drug development programs efficiently and effectively. With a staff averaging 11 years of industry experience and multiple individuals with advanced degrees, PharmOptima also boasts one of the most capable and engaging teams in the industry. The company collaborates with board-certified veterinary ophthalmologist Dr. Ryan Boyd, further enhancing its ocular research capabilities. PharmOptima's team of experts is dedicated to providing high-quality services to the pharmaceutical biotechnology industries. Looking ahead, PharmOptima scientists will be presenting posters at the 2025 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) conference, showcasing their latest research and innovations in ocular drug development. For more information visit www.pharmoptima.com .
April 24, 2025
Two bills, HB 4332 and HB 4333 were recently re-introduced that would prohibit pathogen gain-of-function (GoF) research. Given that the House is now Republican-led raises concerns for MichBio and others that the legislation might gain traction due to misinformation over biosafety and pandemic origins. MichBio opposes such broad legislative bans as they risk undermining critical scientific progress, public health preparedness, and economic innovation. GoF research has been instrumental in developing life-saving therapies and vaccines. For instance, viral vector-based gene therapies, such as Sarepta's Elevidys for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, and oncolytic virotherapies like Amgen's Imlygic for melanoma, rely on genetically modified viruses to deliver therapeutic genes or selectively destroy cancer cells. These advancements stem from GoF methodologies that enhance viral capabilities for therapeutic purposes. Moreover, GoF research has played a pivotal role in vaccine development. Examples like the AstraZeneca and Janssen COVID-19 vaccines and Merck's ERVEBO vaccine against Ebola employs a genetically modified virus to confer protection, underscore the public health benefits derived from GoF studies. ​ Contrary to concerns that GoF research operates without sufficient oversight, multiple layers of regulation are in place. Since 2017, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has implemented a framework to evaluate and guide funding decisions for GoF research, particularly those involving potential pandemic pathogens. This framework includes stringent safety protocols, risk assessments, and ethical reviews. ​ MichBio is most concerned that any legislative bans that broadly define and prohibit GoF research risk stifling innovation across various scientific fields. Such bans could inadvertently encompass research in virology, microbiology, molecular biology, and synthetic biology—disciplines vital for developing new therapies, sustainable agricultural practices, and environmental remediation technologies. ​ In turn, state-level bans on GoF research could have detrimental effects on local economies and academic institutions. Such a ban could impede research critical to understanding and combating diseases, leading to a loss of federal and philanthropic funding. This could hamper the growth of the Michigan's biotech and biomedical sectors. ​  MichBio advocates for a balanced approach that reinforces existing oversight mechanisms and fosters transparent, responsible research practices essential to safeguard both public health and scientific progress.