Federal Advocacy Outlook 2025: Early Days

January 22, 2025

Federal Expectations: White House to Dictate, Congress Likely to Follow

Following the Republican trifecta gain of the White House and both houses of the U.S. Congress, business leaders would be wise to spend early 2025 assessing how politics will drive policy.

 

At this early stage, it’s still unclear what and how policy issues will play out in the near term. However, most political watchers expect that lower corporate taxes, overall deregulation (specifically, decreased scrutiny from the Federal Trade Commission, especially regarding mergers and acquisitions) and a potential rollback of the drug pricing provisions in the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) will aid industry growth.

 

On the other hand, potential tariffs as high as 60% on goods imported from China, 25% on those from Mexico and Canada, as well as 10%–20% on goods imported from other geographies, may wreak havoc on supply chains, manufacturing operations and bottom lines.

 

Note that even if the IRA is partially rolled back, drug pricing reform is still in play. Several pricing mechanisms were proposed in President Trump’s first term that could still materialize in 2025. And there’s still plenty of interest in Congress on curtailing pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) as a way to control patient out-of-pocket drug costs.

 

The uncertainty surrounding the possible confirmation of Robert Kennedy Jr. as Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services and what that might mean for the FDA, NIH and CDC. Some believe that Kennedy will bring positive change to a bureaucracy that needs some overhauling. Part of that belief is predicated on the fact that nominees for FDA, Martin Makary, MD, and Mehmet Oz, MD, have not faced significant criticism as they don’t share similar views with Kennedy and have a good grasp of the agencies they are likely to lead. All this points to product approvals that might be changed but not slowed.

 

With the Trump administration following through with its proposed immigration policy overhaul, as exemplified by an executive order to shut down the H1B visa program, companies may find taking on highly technically skilled immigrant workers across the pharma and medtech sectors more challenging.

 

Lastly, it seems like tax policy will be front and center for the new Administration, especially with a focus on levying tariffs. Attempts will be made to reduce corporate taxes overall and make U.S. businesses more competitive internationally and encourage economic growth. For companies that manufacture products within the U.S., Trump has suggested lowering the tax rate even further. This policy is intended to incentivize domestic production and potentially bring manufacturing jobs back to the U.S.

 

However, the top tax policy priority for the biosciences industry remains- the need to restore the ability to immediately deduct R&D expenses in the year in which they were incurred. An important implication for companies is that the current policy incentivizes investment abroad rather than domestically, bolstering the R&D of foreign corporations rather than our own. Even for R&D that stays here in the U.S., the current requirement that patent costs also be capitalized incentivizes U.S. companies to limit patent filings even further and instead keep their technology a trade secret. In turn, this stifles innovation and commercialization and wreaks havoc on bottom lines, especially for early-stage companies who cannot afford to lose pennies.

 

MichBio, along with its national partners, the Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO)Advanced Medical Technology Association (AdvaMed) and Medical Device Manufacturers Association (MDMA), will be carefully monitoring the federal policy landscape as it evolves in early 2025. As part of that vigilance, MichBio plans to attend the annual AdvaMed State Medtech Alliance Capitol Hill Fly-In on February 25-26, and the BIO Council of State Bioscience Associations (CSBA) Legislative Fly-In on April 1-2. MichBio plans to host a Breakfast Reception for the Michigan Congressional delegation during the BIO Capitol Hill visit. Our members are invited to participate in both DC visits – but space is limited – so contact us ASAP at stephen@michbio.org with your interest.

RECENT ARTICLES

April 24, 2025
Prenuptial Patenting: Responsible Engagement with Engineering Firms
April 24, 2025
PharmOptima, a Poratge, Michigan-based preclinical contract research organization (CRO) is advancing drug discovery through its comprehensive suite of services. Specializing in in-vivo ADME/PK, ocular research, as well as regulated large and small molecule bioanalytical and ligand binding services, PharmOptima supports clients in optimizing drug development programs efficiently and effectively. With a staff averaging 11 years of industry experience and multiple individuals with advanced degrees, PharmOptima also boasts one of the most capable and engaging teams in the industry. The company collaborates with board-certified veterinary ophthalmologist Dr. Ryan Boyd, further enhancing its ocular research capabilities. PharmOptima's team of experts is dedicated to providing high-quality services to the pharmaceutical biotechnology industries. Looking ahead, PharmOptima scientists will be presenting posters at the 2025 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) conference, showcasing their latest research and innovations in ocular drug development. For more information visit www.pharmoptima.com .
April 24, 2025
Two bills, HB 4332 and HB 4333 were recently re-introduced that would prohibit pathogen gain-of-function (GoF) research. Given that the House is now Republican-led raises concerns for MichBio and others that the legislation might gain traction due to misinformation over biosafety and pandemic origins. MichBio opposes such broad legislative bans as they risk undermining critical scientific progress, public health preparedness, and economic innovation. GoF research has been instrumental in developing life-saving therapies and vaccines. For instance, viral vector-based gene therapies, such as Sarepta's Elevidys for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, and oncolytic virotherapies like Amgen's Imlygic for melanoma, rely on genetically modified viruses to deliver therapeutic genes or selectively destroy cancer cells. These advancements stem from GoF methodologies that enhance viral capabilities for therapeutic purposes. Moreover, GoF research has played a pivotal role in vaccine development. Examples like the AstraZeneca and Janssen COVID-19 vaccines and Merck's ERVEBO vaccine against Ebola employs a genetically modified virus to confer protection, underscore the public health benefits derived from GoF studies. ​ Contrary to concerns that GoF research operates without sufficient oversight, multiple layers of regulation are in place. Since 2017, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has implemented a framework to evaluate and guide funding decisions for GoF research, particularly those involving potential pandemic pathogens. This framework includes stringent safety protocols, risk assessments, and ethical reviews. ​ MichBio is most concerned that any legislative bans that broadly define and prohibit GoF research risk stifling innovation across various scientific fields. Such bans could inadvertently encompass research in virology, microbiology, molecular biology, and synthetic biology—disciplines vital for developing new therapies, sustainable agricultural practices, and environmental remediation technologies. ​ In turn, state-level bans on GoF research could have detrimental effects on local economies and academic institutions. Such a ban could impede research critical to understanding and combating diseases, leading to a loss of federal and philanthropic funding. This could hamper the growth of the Michigan's biotech and biomedical sectors. ​  MichBio advocates for a balanced approach that reinforces existing oversight mechanisms and fosters transparent, responsible research practices essential to safeguard both public health and scientific progress.